General
Lawrence Sherman et al. v. John Kemish et al.
161 Conn. 564·Connecticut Supreme Court·1971·CT
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Lawrence Sherman et al. v. John Kemish et al.
Alcorn, C. J., House, Cotter, Ryan and Shapiro, Js.
Argued May 5
decided May 11, 1971
Robert M. Davidson, for the appellant (defendant Grilmore).
L. Douglas Shrader, for the appellant (defendant Marcus).
Emanuel Margolis, Herbert L. Cohen, and Lawrence P. Weisman, for the appellees (plaintiffs).
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
In this matter an intervening defendant has applied for a suspension of the appellate rules and for an expedition -of the appeal. After a full hearing it appears that all of the other parties are in agreement that unless the procedural safeguards on appeal are followed, justice to all of the parties cannot be assured. It further appears that due to applicable statutory and charter requirements, a suspension of the normal appellate procedure would not result in accomplishment of the objective sought by the applicant.
The application is denied.