Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Lucy Bolster, Respondent, v. Ithaca Street Railway Company, Appellant, 1904 — 178 N.Y. 554 · caselaw · US
General
Lucy Bolster, Respondent, v. Ithaca Street Railway Company, Appellant
178 N.Y. 554·New York Court of Appeals·1904·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Lucy Bolster, Respondent, v. Ithaca Street Railway Company, Appellant.
Bolster v. Ithaca Street By. Oo., 79 App. Div. 239, affirmed.
(Argued February 18, 1904;
decided March 4, 1904.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered January 21,1903, reversing a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court at a Trial Term and granting a new trial.
F. A. Denton for appellant.
Myron N. TompJcms for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed and judgment absolute ordered for plaintiff on the stipulation, with costs ; no opinion.
Concur: Pabkeb, Ch. J., Gray, Haight, Martin, Vann, Cullen and Werner, JJ.