General
Arthur Herman, Appellant, v. Thomas Horgan, as Property Clerk of the Police Department of the City of New York, and "John Doe," Name "John Doe" Being Fictitious, Party Intended Being the Person in Possession of the Property Sought to Be Replevied, Respondents
235 A.D. 696·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1932·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Arthur Herman, Appellant, v. Thomas Horgan, as Property Clerk of the Police Department of the City of New York, and “John Doe,” Name “John Doe” Being Fictitious, Party Intended Being the Person in Possession of the Property Sought to Be Replevied, Respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Seudder, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., and Young, J., dissent on authority of People v. Jennings (257 N. Y. 196).