Contracts · MBE-tested
Michael A. Leo et al., Respondents, v. F.L. Heughes & Co., Inc., Appellant, and Artco Contracting, Inc., et al., Respondents; Artco Contracting, Inc., Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Niagara Erecting, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Appellant; F.L. Heughes & Co., Inc., Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Niagara Erecting, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Appellant
266 A.D.2d 809698 N.Y.S.2d 192·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1999·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Michael A. Leo et al., Respondents, v F.L. Heughes & Co., Inc., Appellant, and Artco Contracting, Inc., et al., Respondents. Artco Contracting, Inc., Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent, v Niagara Erecting, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Appellant. F.L. Heughes & Co., Inc., Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent, v Niagara Erecting, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Appellant.
(Appeal No. 2.)
[698 NYS2d 192]
[MAJORITY]
—Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the same Memorandum as in Leo v Artco Contr. (266 AD2d 808 [decided herewith]). (Appeals from Order of Supreme Court, Niagara County, Joslin, J.— Summary Judgment.) Present — Pine, J. P., Hayes, Wisner, Scudder and Balio, JJ.