Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
GRABINA v. UNITED STATES, 1962 — 369 U.S. 426 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
GRABINA v. UNITED STATES
369 U.S. 426·Supreme Court of the United States·1962
Mr. Justice Frankfurter and Mr. Justice White took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
GRABINA v. UNITED STATES.
No. 851,
Misc.
Decided April 16, 1962.
Petitioner pro se.
Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Beatrice Rosenberg and Theodore George Gilin-sky for the United States.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
In light of the concession by the Solicitor General and upon an examination of the entire record, the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the District Court for resentencing.
Mr. Justice Frankfurter and Mr. Justice White took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.