Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In the Matter of the Petition of Henry H. Lyman, Respondent, for an Order Revoking and Canceling Liquor Tax Certificate No. 31,344, Issued to Patrick Ryan, Appellant, 1900 — 161 N.Y. 641 · caselaw · US
Tax
In the Matter of the Petition of Henry H. Lyman, Respondent, for an Order Revoking and Canceling Liquor Tax Certificate No. 31,344, Issued to Patrick Ryan, Appellant
161 N.Y. 641·New York Court of Appeals·1900·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Petition of Henry H. Lyman, Respondent, for an Order Revoking and Canceling Liquor Tax Certificate No. 31,344, Issued to Patrick Ryan, Appellant.
(Submitted January 15, 1900;
decided January 18, 1900.)
Motion to dismiss an appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered "November 15, 1899, which affirmed pro forma an order made by a justice of the Supreme Court at Chambers, appointing a referee to take testimony herein and report the same to the said justice.
The motion was made upon the ground that the order of reference is not appealable, and the order of the Appellate Division is not appealable, no certificate allowing such appeal having been granted.
The appellant, in opposition to the motion, requested leave to withdraw his appeal, without costs, application having been made to the Appellate Division to vacate the order appealed from.
William E. Schenck for motion.
John P. Curley opposed.
[MAJORITY]
Application of appellant to withdraw appeal, without costs, granted.