Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Norma A. MARTIN, Appellant, v. ROYAL MAIL STEAM PACKET COMPANY, Appellee, and Bermuda Transportation Company, Ltd., Defendant, 1933 — 65 F.2d 1019 · caselaw · US
General
Norma A. MARTIN, Appellant, v. ROYAL MAIL STEAM PACKET COMPANY, Appellee, and Bermuda Transportation Company, Ltd., Defendant
65 F.2d 1019·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1933
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Norma A. MARTIN, Appellant, v. ROYAL MAIL STEAM PACKET COMPANY, Appellee, and Bermuda Transportation Company, Ltd., Defendant.
No. 433.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
May 29, 1933.
Sidney J. Feltenstein, of New York City, for appellant.
Burlingham, Yeeder, Fearey, Clark & Hupper, of New York City (Morton L. Fear-ey and Norman M. Barron,-both of New York City, of counsel) for appellee.
Before L. HAND, AUGUSTUS N. HAND, and CHASE, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Judgment affirmed on the authority of Gooch v. Oregon Short Line R. R., 258 U. S. 22, 42 S. Ct. 192, 66 L. Ed. 443, and Hessler v. North German Lloyd (C. C. A.) 55 F.(2d) 927.