Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers et al. v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad Co. et al.; and Hardin et al. v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad Co. et al., 1965 — 381 U.S. 949 · caselaw · US
General
Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers et al. v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad Co. et al.; and Hardin et al. v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad Co. et al.
381 U.S. 949·Supreme Court of the United States·1965
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 1054.
No. 1070.
Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers et al. v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad Co. et al.; and Hardin et al. v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad Co. et al.
James E. Youngdahl for appellants in No. 1054. Bruce Bennett, Attorney General of Arkansas, and Jack L. Lessenberry for appellants in No. 1070. Robert V. Light, Thurman Arnold, Dennis G. Lyons, W. J. Smith and H. H. Friday for appellees in both cases.
[MAJORITY]
Appeals from D. C. W. D. Ark. Probable jurisdiction noted. Cases consolidated and a total of two hours allotted for oral argument.
Reported below: 239 F. Supp. 1.