Criminal Law · MBE-tested

William HASSELL v. STATE of Arkansas

343 Ark. 76437 S.W.3d 620·Arkansas Supreme Court·2001·AR

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

William HASSELL v. STATE of Arkansas CR 01-171 37 S.W.3d 620 Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered February 22, 2001 Robert L. Hertzfield, Jr., for appellant. No response. [MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.] PER CURIAM. Appellant William Hassell, by and through his attorney, has filed a motion for rule on clerk. His attorney, Robert L. Herzfeld, Jr., states in the motion that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part. We find that such an error, admittedly made by an attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam). The motion is, therefore, granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.