Bankruptcy
Grace MORRIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Rhonda Rae MARRIN, Defendant-Appellee
403 F. App'x 876·United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·2010
Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Grace MORRIS, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Rhonda Rae MARRIN, Defendant—Appellee.
No. 10-1616.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Nov. 30, 2010.
Decided: Dec. 3, 2010.
Grace Morris, Appellant Pro Se. Rhonda Rae Marrin, Appellee Pro Se.
Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM:]
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Grace Morris appeals from the district court’s order dismissing her appeal from the bankruptcy court order for failure to comply with Fed. R. Bankr.P. 8006. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and find no reversible error and no abuse of discretion. See Fed. R. Bankr.P. 8001(a); In re SPR Corp., 45 F.3d 70, 74 (4th Cir.1995); In re Serra Builders, Inc., 970 F.2d 1309, 1311 (4th Cir.1992). Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Morris v. Marrin, No. 3:10-cv-00050-JRS (E.D.Va. Apr. 29, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.