Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
United States v. Hall, Chief Judge, U. S. District Court, 1960 — 362 U.S. 990 · caselaw · US
General
United States v. Hall, Chief Judge, U. S. District Court
362 U.S. 990·Supreme Court of the United States·1960
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 850.
United States v. Hall, Chief Judge, U. S. District Court.
Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Morton, Daniel M. Friedman and Roger P. Marquis for the United States.
Robert M. Adams, Jr. for respondent.
Conrad J. Moss and James C. Hollingsworth filed a brief for Edith H. Hoffman et al., as amici curiae, in opposition to the petition.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.