Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Joint Council 53, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America, et al. v. Meyer et al.; and Local 107, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America, et al. v. Meyer et al., 1965 — 382 U.S. 897 · caselaw · US
General
Joint Council 53, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America, et al. v. Meyer et al.; and Local 107, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America, et al. v. Meyer et al.
382 U.S. 897·Supreme Court of the United States·1965
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
October 29, 1965.
No. 89.
No. 94.
Joint Council 53, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America, et al. v. Meyer et al.; and Local 107, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America, et al. v. Meyer et al.
Edward Davis for petitioners in No. 89.
Richard H. Markowitz for petitioners in No. 94.
Paul L. Jaffe for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Sup. Ct. Pa. Petitions for writs of certiorari dismissed pursuant to Rule 60 of the Rules of this Court.
Reported below: 416 Pa. 401, 206 A. 2d 382.