Torts · MBE-tested
Charles E. Rose, Respondent, v. The City of Troy, Appellant
192 N.Y. 551·New York Court of Appeals·1908·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Charles E. Rose, Respondent, v. The City of Troy, Appellant.
Rose v. City of Troy, 119 App. Div. 927, affirmed.
(Argued April 15, 1908;
decided May 19, 1908.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered May 10, 1907, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial in an action to recover for personal injuries alleged to have occurred through defendant’s negligence in permitting an obstruction to remain in a public street.
P. H. Russell and G. B. Wellington for appellant.
Frank H. Deal and Thomas F. Powers for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs ; no opinion.
Concur : Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Haight, Vann, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock and Chase, JJ.