General
China Man Way Fur Corp. v. United States
41 Cust. Ct. 321·United States Customs Court·1958
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 62172.
China Man Way Fur Corp. v. United States,
protests 947269-G, etc. (New York).
[MAJORITY — Wilson, J.]
Opinion by
Wilson, J.
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items marked “K” consist of goatskin or kidskin plates and the items marked “L” of lambskin plates the same in all material respects as those the subject of A. S. Gold & Bro., Inc. v. United States (33 Cust. Ct. 120, C. D. 1643), the claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained.
[DISSENT — Mollison, J.,]
Mollison, J.,
dissented for the reasons set forth in his dissenting opinion in C. D. 1643, supra.