Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Max Gluckman et al., Respondents, v. Simon Strauch et al., Appellants, 1906 — 186 N.Y. 560 · caselaw · US
IP
Max Gluckman et al., Respondents, v. Simon Strauch et al., Appellants
186 N.Y. 560·New York Court of Appeals·1906·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Max Gluckman et al., Respondents, v. Simon Strauch et al., Appellants.
Gluckman v. Strauch, 99 App. Div. 361, affirmed.
(Argued October 15, 1906;
decided November 13, 1906.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered December 30, 1904, reversing a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court on trial at Special Term, and granting a new trial in an action to restrain the alleged infringement of a trade mark.
S. K. Lichenstein and IF. F. Ashley, Jr., for appellants.
John Fwen and Freclericlc F. Anderson for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed and judgment absolute ordered against appellants on the stipulation, with costs in all courts; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Haight, Yann, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Hiscook, JJ. Absent: Gray, J.