Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Kaplow, Executor, v. Reinfeld et al., doing business as Bronfman Interests and Browne-Vintners Co., Inc., et al., 1956 — 352 U.S. 844 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Kaplow, Executor, v. Reinfeld et al., doing business as Bronfman Interests and Browne-Vintners Co., Inc., et al.
352 U.S. 844·Supreme Court of the United States·1956
Mr. Justice Reed took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 187.
Kaplow, Executor, v. Reinfeld et al., doing business as Bronfman Interests and Browne-Vintners Co., Inc., et al.
Maurice Edelbaum for petitioner. Theodore Kiendl and William R. Meagher for Reinfeld et al., and Lowell Wadmond and Thomas Kiernan for Bronfman et ah, respondents.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Reed took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.