Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Albert T. Patrick, Appellant, 1902 — 172 N.Y. 599 · caselaw · US
General
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Albert T. Patrick, Appellant
172 N.Y. 599·New York Court of Appeals·1902·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Albert T. Patrick, Appellant.
(Argued October 6, 1902;
decided October 8, 1902.)
Motion, under the provision of section 536 of chapter 369 of the Laws of 1902, to extend time in which to move argument of appeal from judgment of death.
John G. Tomlinson and Edgar J. Kohler for motion.
No one opposed.
[MAJORITY]
• Motion denied on the ground that defendant has six months from September 1, 1902, the time the act took effect, 'in which to argue the appeal, which time the court deems amply sufficient.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Cullen and Werner, JJ. Dissenting ; Vann, J.