Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
O'Leary et al. v. Liggett Drug Co.; O'Leary et al. v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.; and O'Leary et al. v. Johnston-Shelton Co., doing business as The Home Store, 1945 — 326 U.S. 773 · caselaw · US
General
O'Leary et al. v. Liggett Drug Co.; O'Leary et al. v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.; and O'Leary et al. v. Johnston-Shelton Co., doing business as The Home Store
326 U.S. 773·Supreme Court of the United States·1945
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 546.
No. 547.
No. 548.
O’Leary et al. v. Liggett Drug Co.; O’Leary et al. v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.; and O’Leary et al. v. Johnston-Shelton Co., doing business as The Home Store.
December 3, 1945.
Mr. Marston Allen for petitioners.
Messrs. Henry M. Huxley and Ralph Munden for respondents in Nos. 546 and 547, and Mr. H. A. Toulmin, Jr. for respondent in No. 548.
[MAJORITY]
Petition for writs of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Reported below: 150 F. 2d 656.