Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Chandler, U. S. District Judge v. Judicial Council of the Tenth Circuit of the United States, 1969 — 396 U.S. 809 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Chandler, U. S. District Judge v. Judicial Council of the Tenth Circuit of the United States
396 U.S. 809·Supreme Court of the United States·1969
Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this order.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 2,
Misc.
Chandler, U. S. District Judge v. Judicial Council of the Tenth Circuit of the United States.
[For earlier order herein, see 395 U. S. 956.]
[MAJORITY]
Motion of Carl L. Shipley, pro se, for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted. Motion of Solicitor General Griswold, pro se, for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae granted and 30 minutes allotted for that purpose. Thirty additional minutes allotted to counsel for petitioner. Case removed from current argument list and it is ordered that briefs and oral arguments be presented by counsel for the parties.
Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this order.