Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
TV PIX, INC., et al. v. ALLARD et al., COMMISSIONERS OF THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF NEVADA, 1967 — 389 U.S. 6 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
TV PIX, INC., et al. v. ALLARD et al., COMMISSIONERS OF THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF NEVADA
389 U.S. 6·Supreme Court of the United States·1967
Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
TV PIX, INC., et al. v. ALLARD et al., COMMISSIONERS OF THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF NEVADA.
No. 79.
Decided October 9, 1967.
George M. McMillan and Paul A. Richards for appellants.
Harvey Dickerson, Attorney General of Nevada, for appellees.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the District Court to give that court an opportunity to consider the appellants’ motion to file a supplemental complaint based upon changes in the relevant Nevada law.
Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.