Criminal Law · MBE-tested

Jeremiah CLARK v. STATE of Arkansas

348 Ark. 78274 S.W.3d 215·Arkansas Supreme Court·2002·AR

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

Jeremiah CLARK v. STATE of Arkansas 02-430 74 S.W.3d 215 Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered May 16, 2002 Althea E. Hadden, for appellant. No response. [MAJORITY — Per Curiam.] Per Curiam. Appellant Jeremiah Clark, by and through his attorney, has filed a motion for rule on clerk. His attorney, Althea E. Hadden, states in the motion that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on her part. We find that such an error, admittedly made by an attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam). The motion is, therefore, granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.