Criminal Law · MBE-tested
Milton Thomas KING v. STATE of Arkansas
339 Ark. 1373 S.W.3d 334·Arkansas Supreme Court·1999·AR
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Milton Thomas KING v. STATE of Arkansas
CR 99-1222
3 S.W.3d 334
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Opinion delivered November 4, 1999
R. David Lewis, for appellant.
Mark Pryor, Att’y Gen., by: David R. Raupp, Sr. Ass’t Att’y Gen., for appellee.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Milton Thomas King, by and through his attorney, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. His attorney, R. David Lewis, admits in his motion that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part.
We find an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).
The motion for rule on the clerk is, therefore, granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.