General
Rudolph M. Haan, Appellant, v. Sarah E. Fox, Respondent
184 N.Y. 591·New York Court of Appeals·1906·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Rudolph M. Haan, Appellant, v. Sarah E. Fox, Respondent.
Haan v. Fox, 99 App. Div. 624, affirmed.
(Argued March 16, 1906;
decided April 3, 1906.)
Appeal from a final judgment, entered March 15, 1905, jzpon an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department affirming an interlocutory judgment of Special Term sustaining a demurrer to the complaint.
S. liningston Samuels and Myron 11. Oppenheim for appellant.
John A. Garner for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Yann, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ.