Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
William P. Schoolcraft, Appellant, v. The Sacandaga Land Company, Respondent, 1900 — 163 N.Y. 609 · caselaw · US
General
William P. Schoolcraft, Appellant, v. The Sacandaga Land Company, Respondent
163 N.Y. 609·New York Court of Appeals·1900·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
William P. Schoolcraft, Appellant, v. The Sacandaga Land Company, Respondent.
Schoolcraft v. Sacandaga Land Oo., 30 App. Div. 622, affirmed.
(Submitted June 15, 1900;
decided June 22, 1900.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered May 23, 1898, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court at a Trial Term.
L. F. Fish for appellant.
H. V. Borst for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Jidgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Vann and Cullen, JJ. Not sitting: Landon, J.