Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Bouie et al. v. City of Columbia, 1963 — 374 U.S. 805 · caselaw · US
General
Bouie et al. v. City of Columbia
374 U.S. 805·Supreme Court of the United States·1963
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 159.
Jack Greenberg, Constance Baker Motley, Jame's M. Nabrit III, Matthew J. Perry and Lincoln C. Jenkins, Jr. for petitioners. Daniel R. McLeod, Attorney General of South Carolina, for respondent.
Bouie et al. v. City of Columbia.
[MAJORITY]
Supreme Court of South Carolina. Certiorari granted.