Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
SHELLMAR PRODUCTS COMPANY v. ALLEN-QUALLEY COMPANY, 1934 — 67 F.2d 1010 · caselaw · US
General
SHELLMAR PRODUCTS COMPANY v. ALLEN-QUALLEY COMPANY
67 F.2d 1010·United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit·1934
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
SHELLMAR PRODUCTS COMPANY v. ALLEN-QUALLEY COMPANY.
No. 4215.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.
Jan. 22, 1934.
Franklin M. Warden, of Chicago, 111., for petitioner..
M. K. Hobbs,- of Chicago, HI., for respondent.
Before ALSCHULER, SPARKS, and FITZHENRY, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
This cause coming on to be heard upon the said petition and the answer thereto, and the court having heard the arguments of counsel, and being fully advised in the premises, it is ordered by the court that leave be, and it is hereby granted to the petitioner herein to apply to the District Court in and for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, for leave to present and file in said District Court petitioner’s bill of review as prayed in its said petition herein.