General
William Pittman, as Administrator, etc., Respondent, v. Henry H. Hall et al., Appellants
112 N.Y. 659·New York Court of Appeals·1889·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
William Pittman, as Administrator, etc., Respondent, v. Henry H. Hall et al., Appellants.
(Argued December 13, 1888;
decided January 15, 1889.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the City-Court of Brooklyn, entered upon an order made Hovember 22, 1886, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term.'
James D. Bell for appellants.
Frederic A. Wa/rd for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.