General
Henry C. Hopkins, Respondent, v. James F. A. Clark et al., Appellants
151 N.Y. 632·New York Court of Appeals·1896·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Henry C. Hopkins, Respondent, v. James F. A. Clark et al., Appellants.
Reported below, 7 App. Div. 207.
(Argued November 30, 1896;
decided December 8, 1896.)
Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered August 12, 1896, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict, and also affirmed an order denying a motion for a new trial. The motion was made upon the ground that no questions of law are raised by the appellants’ exceptions which can be reviewed by the Court of Appeals.
Edgar J. Nathan for motion.
John W. Houston opposed.
[MAJORITY]
Motion denied, with costs.