Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
McGrath, Attorney General of the United States, v. Paramount Pictures, Inc. et al.; Sparling, Superintendent of Banks, v. Paramount Pictures, Inc. et al., 1950 — 339 U.S. 953 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
McGrath, Attorney General of the United States, v. Paramount Pictures, Inc. et al.; Sparling, Superintendent of Banks, v. Paramount Pictures, Inc. et al.
339 U.S. 953·Supreme Court of the United States·1950
Mr. Justice Clark took no part in the consideration or decision of these applications.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 594. No. 613.
McGrath, Attorney General of the United States, v. Paramount Pictures, Inc. et al. Sparling, Superintendent of Banks, v. Paramount Pictures, Inc. et al.
District Court of Appeal, First Appellate District, of California; and Supreme Court of California.
Solicitor General Perlman for petitioner in No. 594.
Dudley T. Shearer for petitioner in No. 613.
Homer I. Mitchell for Paramount Pictures, Inc.; and Walter S. Hilborn for the Bank of America National Trust & Savings Assn, et al., respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Clark took no part in the consideration or decision of these applications.