General
Ethel Scull, Individually and as a Shareholder, Officer and Director and in the Right of Rivo Service Corp., et al., Respondents, v. Robert C. Scull et al., Respondents, and Raoul L. Felder, Appellant. Phillips, Nizer, Benjamin, Krim & Ballon, Outgoing Attorneys for Respondents
97 A.D.2d 704·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1983·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Ethel Scull, Individually and as a Shareholder, Officer and Director and in the Right of Rivo Service Corp., et al., Respondents, v Robert C. Scull et al., Respondents, and Raoul L. Felder, Appellant. Phillips, Nizer, Benjamin, Krim & Ballon, Outgoing Attorneys for Respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Appeal from order, Supreme Court, New York County (Louis Grossman, J.), entered on May 31, 1983, unanimously dismissed as an appeal by a nonaggrieved party. Were we to consider the merits, we would affirm. Phillips, Nizer, Benjamin, Krim and Ballon shall recover of appellant $50 costs and disbursements of this appeal. No opinion. Concur — Kupferman, J. P., Sullivan, Ross, Carro and Milonas, JJ.