Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers Union et al. v. Denver Milk Producers, Inc. et al., 1948 — 334 U.S. 809 · caselaw · US
General
International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers Union et al. v. Denver Milk Producers, Inc. et al.
334 U.S. 809·Supreme Court of the United States·1948
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
May 3, 1948.
No. 397.
Argued January 9, 1948.
Decided May 3, 1948.
Cf. Rescue Army v. Municipal Court, 331 U. S. 549 (1947). Dissenting: Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Murphy. Herbert S. Thatcher argued the cause for appellants. With him on the brief were /. Albert Woll and Philip Hornbein, Jr. Kenneth W. Robinson argued the cause and filed a brief for appellees. Robert D. Charlton was also of counsel. By special leave of Court, George K. Thomas, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for the State of Colorado, as amicus curiae, urging affirmance. With him on the brief was H. Lawrence Hinkley, Attorney General.
International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers Union et al. v. Denver Milk Producers, Inc. et al.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
Because of the inadequacy of the record, we decline to decide the constitutional issues involved. The appeal is dismissed without prejudice to the determination in further proceedings of any questions arising under the Federal Constitution.