Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Ex parte: In the Matter of Athanasi Nicola, Petitioner, 1910 — 218 U.S. 668 · caselaw · US
General
Ex parte: In the Matter of Athanasi Nicola, Petitioner
218 U.S. 668·Supreme Court of the United States·1910
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 8,
Original.
Ex parte: In the Matter of Athanasi Nicola, Petitioner.
Argued November 28, 1910.
Decided December 5, 1910.
Mr. Lon O. Hocker, Mr. J. J. Darlington and Mr. James C. Jones for petitioner.
Mr. Tyson S. Dines and Mr. Millard F. Watts for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Petition for a writ of mandamus denied, rule discharged, and petition dismissed, on authority of Tobin, Petitioner, 214 U. S. 507.