General
Charles G. Hottenroth, Respondent, v. The City of New York and Brooklyn Cooperage Company, Defendants. East River Terminal Railroad, Appellant
170 A.D. 946·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1915·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Charles G. Hottenroth, Respondent, v. The City of New York and Brooklyn Cooperage Company, Defendants. East River Terminal Railroad, Appellant.
[MAJORITY]
Motion for reargument denied, with ten dollars costs. Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied, without costs. Present—Carr, Stapleton, Rich and Putnam, JJ.