General

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. David Holman, Also Known as Sir D, Appellant

270 A.D.2d 360704 N.Y.S.2d 878·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·2000·NY

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v David Holman, Also Known as Sir D, Appellant. [704 NYS2d 878] [MAJORITY] —Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated March 23, 1998 (People v Holman, 248 AD2d 637), affirming a judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County, rendered March 6, 1996. Ordered that the application is denied. The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel (see, Jones v Barnes, 463 US 745). Santucci, J. P., Joy, Friedmann and McGinity, JJ., concur.