General
Charles E. Allcock, Individually and as a City Marshal of the City of New York, Respondent-Appellant, v. Abraham S. Cohen, as Surviving Partner of the Firm of Cohen & Kobre, Attorneys at Law, and as a Partner of the Firm of A. S. & H. M. Cohen, Attorneys at Law, Appellant-Respondent, et al,, Defendants
269 A.D. 843·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1945·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Charles E. Allcock, Individually and as a City Marshal of the City of New York, Respondent-Appellant, v. Abraham S. Cohen, as Surviving Partner of the Firm of Cohen & Kobre, Attorneys at Law, and as a Partner of the Firm of A. S. & H. M. Cohen, Attorneys at Law, Appellant-Respondent, et al,, Defendants.
[MAJORITY]
Action by a city marshal to recover fees allegedly due to him upon various executions issued by defendant attorney upon judgments recovered by his clients, the defendant banks. The plaintiff, and defendant Abraham S. Cohen, cross-appeal from an order granting in part and denying in part a motion by said defendant, pursuant to subdivision 5 of rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice to dismiss the complaint for failure to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action against him. Order insofar as appealed from affirmed, without costs, the amended complaint to be served within ten days from the entry of the order hereon. No opinion. Close, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Adel and Lewis, JJ., concur. [184 Misc. 620.]