General
Arthur Schroeder, Respondent, v. Coatesville Rolling Mill Company et al., Appellants
164 N.Y. 587·New York Court of Appeals·1900·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Arthur Schroeder, Respondent, v. Coatesville Rolling Mill Company et al., Appellants.
Sohroeder v. Ooatesville B. M. Oo., 31 App. Div. 295, affirmed.
(Argued October 8, 1900;
decided October 26, 1900.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered July 11, 1898, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict, and an order denying a motion for a new trial.
John J. Dslany for appellants.
Henry W. Showers for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Martin, Yann and Landon, JJ.