Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
United States v. Fitch, 1895 — 163 U.S. 631 · caselaw · US
Tax
United States v. Fitch
163 U.S. 6311896 U.S. LEXIS 2294·Supreme Court of the United States·1895
Mr. Justice Harlan dissented.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
United States v. Fitch.
Error to the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
No. 828.
Submitted with No. 422.
Mr. Solicitor Generad- for plaintiffs in error.
Mr. Benjamin F. Dos Passos and Mr. Edgar J. Levey for defendant in error.
[MAJORITY — Mr. Justice Brown.]
Mr. Justice Brown.
In this case George W. Cullum, a resident of the State of New York, died in the city of New York on February 28,1892, leaving á last will and testament, which, on the 30th day of April, 1892, was duly admitted to probate/ By this will the testator bequeathed to the United States government the sum of $175,100, upon which, by order of the Surrogate’s Court, there was assessed an inheritance tax of $8755.
The case does not differ in principle from the one above decided, and the judgment of the court below is, therefore,
Affirmed.
Mr. Justice Harlan dissented.