Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Riss & Co., Inc. v. United States et al., 1952 — 342 U.S. 937 · caselaw · US
General
Riss & Co., Inc. v. United States et al.
342 U.S. 937·Supreme Court of the United States·1952
Me. Justice Black, Mr. Justice Reed,' and Mr. Justice' Douglas are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set down for argument.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 541.
Riss & Co., Inc. v. United States et al.
John B. Gage, Wendell Berge and A. Alvis Layne, Jr. for appellant.
Solicitor General Perlman and Daniel W. Knowlton for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission; Carl L. Steiner for the Spector Motor Service, Inc.; and John R. Norris for the Interstate Common. Carrier. Council of Maryland, Inc. et al., appellees.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.
Me. Justice Black, Mr. Justice Reed,' and Mr. Justice' Douglas are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set down for argument.