Contracts · MBE-tested
Joseph F. McLoughlin, Respondent, v. August Belmont and Walther Luttgen, Appellants
120 A.D. 873·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1907·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Joseph F. McLoughlin, Respondent, v. August Belmont and Walther Luttgen, Appellants.
Appeal from an order denyjng-a motion for an order referring the issues to a-single referee for trial.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
Upon the argument of this appeal the plaintiff stipulated in open court that he would waive the right to recover upon a quantum meruit, and rest his right to recover solely'upon the express contract alleged in the complaint. Upon this stipulation the order will be affirmed, without costs, the stipulation to be incorporated in the order to be entered hereon, which is to be settled on notice. Present — Ingraham, McLaughlin, Clarke, Houghton and Lambert, JJ. Order affirmed, without costs, on conditions stated in opinion. Settle order on notice. ■