Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Moritz NEUBERGER, Plaintiff in Error, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant in Error, Appellee, 1925 — 9 F.2d 1020 · caselaw · US
General
Moritz NEUBERGER, Plaintiff in Error, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant in Error, Appellee
9 F.2d 1020·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1925
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Moritz NEUBERGER, Plaintiff in Error, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant in Error, Appellee.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
November 24, 1925.)
No. 101.
Appeal from and in Error to the District Court of the United States for the -Southern District of New York.
For opinion below, see 6 F.(2d) 387.
Before HOUGH, HAND, and MACK, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
This cause came here both by appeal and writ of error from order entered in the District Court for the Southern District of New York. Moritz Neuberger having filed a petition for naturalization, the same duly came on for hearing in the court below- After hearing, said court entered an order declaring that “said petition is hereby denied.” Thereupon said Moritz Neuberger took an appeal and a writ of error.
Questions Certified.
.(1) Has the Circuit Court of Appeals jurisdiction to review the order of the District Court denying the petition to be admitted to citizenship in the United States?
If the answer to the first question is in the affirmative:
(2) Is an appeal the appropriate remedy for obtaining such review?
(3) Is a writ of error the appropriate remedy for obtaining such review?