Contracts · MBE-tested
WINKLE v. BANNAN, WARDEN
368 U.S. 34·Supreme Court of the United States·1961
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
WINKLE v. BANNAN, WARDEN.
No. 93,
Misc.
Decided November 6, 1961.
Petitioner pro se.
Paul L. Adams, Attorney General of Michigan, Joseph B. Bilitzke, Solicitor General, and Robert Weinbaum, Assistant Solicitor General, for respondent.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and, as suggested by the Attorney General of Michigan, the case is remanded for consideration in light of Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U. S. 643.