Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Ada DEMPSEY, Adm'x, Appellant, v. FAIRMONT CREAMERY CO., Appellee, 1929 — 37 F.2d 335 · caselaw · US
General
Ada DEMPSEY, Adm'x, Appellant, v. FAIRMONT CREAMERY CO., Appellee
37 F.2d 335·United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·1929
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Ada DEMPSEY, Adm’x, Appellant, v. FAIRMONT CREAMERY CO., Appellee.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
December 31, 1929.
No. 8590.
Before VAN VALKENBURGH and GARDNER, Circuit Judges, and MUNGER, District Judge.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
A stipulation was filed in this case by which it was agreed that this case should be submitted upon the record filed in case No. 8591, George L. Reed, Appellant, v. Fairmont Creamery Co., Appellee, 37 F.(2d) 332, and that the decision in that case should control this case, and the stipulation was approved by the court.
An opinion having been filed on this date affirming the decree in case No. 8591, George L. Reed, Appellant, v. Fairmont Creamery Co., Appellee, 37 F.(2d) 332, it is ordered that the decree in this case be affirmed.