Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
George F. Bindrim et al., as Executors of Mathias Bindrim, Deceased, Respondents, v. Barbara Ullrich et al., Defendants. William E. Bindrim et al., Appellants, 1902 — 173 N.Y. 587 · caselaw · US
Securities
George F. Bindrim et al., as Executors of Mathias Bindrim, Deceased, Respondents, v. Barbara Ullrich et al., Defendants. William E. Bindrim et al., Appellants
173 N.Y. 587·New York Court of Appeals·1902·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
George F. Bindrim et al., as Executors of Mathias Bindrim, Deceased, Respondents, v. Barbara Ullrich et al., Defendants. William E. Bindrim et al., Appellants.
Bindrim v. Ullrich, 64 App. Div. 444, appeal dismissed.
(Submitted December 15, 1902;
decided December 18, 1902.)
Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered November 21, 1901, affirming a .judgment of Special Term construing the will of Mathias Bindrim, deceased.
The motion was made on the ground that the appeal had not been perfected by giving the security required by section 1326 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
John B. Quintin for motion.
Russell Benedict opposed.
[MAJORITY]
Motion granted and appeal dismissed-, without costs of appeal, but with ten dollars costs of motion.