Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
JONES v. FRITSCHLE, 1873 — 154 U.S. 590 · caselaw · US
General
JONES v. FRITSCHLE
154 U.S. 59021 L. Ed. 552·Supreme Court of the United States·1873
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
JONES v. FRITSCHLE.
APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF MISSOURI.
No. 59.
Argued November 22, 1872.
Decided January 6, 1873.
Dismissed because the amount in controversy does not give the court jurisdiction.
The case is stated in the opinion.
Mr. James A. Buchanan for appellant.
Mr. J. C. Robinson for appellee.
[MAJORITY — Mr. Chief Justice Chase]
Mr. Chief Justice Chase
delivered the opinion of the court.
This controversy relates only to certain land in Macon County, Missouri, the value of which, as stated in the answer, was one thousand dollars. 'Phis statement is confirmed by the evidence. The amount in controversy, therefore, does not exceed two thousand dollars, and we have no jurisdiction of the case on appeal.
The appeal must be dismissed.