Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Aaron R. Stevens et al., Respondents, v. The Union Trust Company of New York et al., Appellants, 1895 — 144 N.Y. 655 · caselaw · US
General
Aaron R. Stevens et al., Respondents, v. The Union Trust Company of New York et al., Appellants
144 N.Y. 655·New York Court of Appeals·1895·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Aaron R. Stevens et al., Respondents, v. The Union Trust Company of New York et al., Appellants.
(Argued December 10, 1894;
decided January 15, 1895.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered upon an order made September 29, 1894, which affirmed an interlocutory judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon an order of Special Term overruling a demurrer to the complaint.
Wheeler H. Peckham for appellants.
Edward Winslow Paige for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm on authority of Harrison v. Same Defendant (ante, p. 326), but with leave to answer on payment of costs of demurrer within twenty days after notice of entry of judgment; no opinion.
All concur, except Peckham, J., not voting,,and Haight, J., not sitting.
Judgment accordingly.