Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
CENTRAL ARIZONA LIGHT & POWER COMPANY, a Corporation, Appellant, v. CORPORATION COMMISSION OF ARIZONA et al., Appellees, 1935 — 75 F.2d 1007 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
CENTRAL ARIZONA LIGHT & POWER COMPANY, a Corporation, Appellant, v. CORPORATION COMMISSION OF ARIZONA et al., Appellees
75 F.2d 1007·United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·1935
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
CENTRAL ARIZONA LIGHT & POWER COMPANY, a Corporation, Appellant, v. CORPORATION COMMISSION OF ARIZONA et al., Appellees.
Nos. 7664-7676.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
March 15, 1935.
Armstrong, Kramer, Morrison & Roche, R. W. Kramer, Walter Roche, all of Phoenix, Ariz., and F. G. Coates, of Houston, Tex., for appellant.
John L. Sullivan, Atty. Gen., and Dudley W. Windes, Asst. Afty. Gen., for ap-pellees.
Before WILBUR, GARRECHT, and DENMAN, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Upon consideration of stipulations of counsel for respective parties, ordered appeals dismissed, without costs to either party; mandates forthwith.