Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
BLUE v. HERKIMER NAT. BANK, 1930 — 37 F.2d 663 · caselaw · US
General
BLUE v. HERKIMER NAT. BANK
37 F.2d 663·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1930
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
BLUE v. HERKIMER NAT. BANK.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
January 6, 1930.
No. 155.
Charles E. Snyder and Snyder, Cristman & Snyder, all of Herkimer, N. Y., for appellant.
Cornelius J. Danaher, of Meriden, Conn., and Willis, Doolittle & Guile, of Utiea, N. Y. (Woodward W. Guile, of Utiea, N. Y., of counsel), for respondent.
Before L. HAND, SWAN, and MACK, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
.Affirmed on opinion below.