Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Irving T. Bush, Appellant, v. Bird S. Coler, as Comptroller of the City of New York, et al., Respondents, 1902 — 170 N.Y. 587 · caselaw · US
Corporations
Irving T. Bush, Appellant, v. Bird S. Coler, as Comptroller of the City of New York, et al., Respondents
170 N.Y. 587·New York Court of Appeals·1902·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Irving T. Bush, Appellant, v. Bird S. Coler, as Comptroller of the City of New York, et al., Respondents.
Bush v. Ooler, 60 App. Div. 66, affirmed.
(Argued February 25, 1903;
decided March 25, 1902.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered April 10, 1901, which affirmed a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court on trial at Special Term.
Frederic R. Kellogg for appellant.
George L. Rives, Corporation Counsel (Terence Farley and Theodore Connoly of counsel), for the comptroller of and the city of New York, respondents.
FranMún Bien, respondent, in person.
M. R. Crow for New York and Westchester Water Company, respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Pabkee. Oh. J., Babtlett, Haight, Mabtin, Vann, Cullen and Webnee, JJ.