Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Co. v. Reily, Collector of Revenue of Louisiana, 1961 — 368 U.S. 809 · caselaw · US
General
Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Co. v. Reily, Collector of Revenue of Louisiana
368 U.S. 809·Supreme Court of the United States·1961
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 264.
Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Co. v. Reily, Collector of Revenue of Louisiana.
Robert 0. Brown, Robert E. Rice, C. Vernon Porter, Benjamin B. Taylor, Jr. and Laurance W. Brooks for appellant. John B. Smullin for appellee. Briefs of amici curiae, urging reversal, were filed by Charles D. Marshall for Thomas Jordon, Inc.; Cicero C. Sessions for Sperry Rand Corp.; Albert L. Hopkins for Chicago Bridge & Iron Co.; Ben R. Miller for American Can Co.; Forrest M. Darrough for Humble Oil & Refining Co.; and Robert E. Leake, Jr. for Bosson-Richards Processing Co. et al.
[MAJORITY]
Appeal from the Supreme Court of Louisiana. Probable jurisdiction noted.