General
FAUSER v. UNITED STATES
260 F. 1022·United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·1919
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
FAUSER v. UNITED STATES.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
December 1, 1919.)
No. 3419.
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Southern División of the Southern District of California.
Rob■ert 'O’Connor, U. S. Atty., and Gordon Lawson, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Los Angeles, Cal.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Ordered,, writ of error dismissed for noncompliance by the plaintiff in error with the provisions of subdivision 1 of rule 16 of the rules of. practice of this court (208 Fed. ix, 124 C. C. A. ix.)